The interface between intellectual property and competition policy is a difficult one. Both aim to correct for market failure in the pursuit of economic efficiency. However, in correcting for one market failure, we may exacerbate another. This article raises a number of specific issues which have arisen at this interface, at both the policy and enforcement levels. It discusses the Australian response to questions of spare parts, journalists copyright, parallel imports, databases and collecting societies, all issues which have arisen internationally in recent years.
PAGES
383 – 393
DOI
All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Issues
Also in this issue:
-
Automated plagiarism
-
Generative artificial intelligence in qualitative analysis: a critical examination of tools, trust and rigor
-
‘Foreignize yourself’. What has translation to do with innovation? A translation studies approach to hybrid innovation
-
From tools to symbols: exploring the complex nexus of smartphones in Bangladesh
-
Impoverishing peer review
The Interface between Intellectual Property Rights and Competition Law and Policy: An Australian Perspective
PAPERS