Long, long ago, when we were all much younger, academic authors committed their wisdom to manuscripts and their manuscripts to academic journals. Editors would then consult with experts in the subject of the submission, who would share their opinion with editor and author alike. If editors and referees decided the submission – probably after some revision – had something to add to the world’s knowledge, it would be passed on to the journal’s grateful publisher for the very separate process of publication. Authors, editors and referees worked in happy harmony, only too glad to play their part in the collegial obligation of academics and in the social responsibility they shared with publishers to enhance the common intellectual weal.

PAGES
5 – 9
DOI
All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Issues
Also in this issue:
-
Automated plagiarism
-
Generative artificial intelligence in qualitative analysis: a critical examination of tools, trust and rigor
-
‘Foreignize yourself’. What has translation to do with innovation? A translation studies approach to hybrid innovation
-
From tools to symbols: exploring the complex nexus of smartphones in Bangladesh
-
Do AIs have politics? Thinking about ChatGPT through the work of Langdon Winner