The interface between intellectual property and competition policy is a difficult one. Both aim to correct for market failure in the pursuit of economic efficiency. However, in correcting for one market failure, we may exacerbate another. This article raises a number of specific issues which have arisen at this interface, at both the policy and enforcement levels. It discusses the Australian response to questions of spare parts, journalists copyright, parallel imports, databases and collecting societies, all issues which have arisen internationally in recent years.
PAGES
383 – 393
DOI
All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Issues
Also in this issue:
-
Do AIs have politics? Thinking about ChatGPT through the work of Langdon Winner
-
Creating value through service innovation: an effectual design thinking framework
-
Health and medical researchers are willing to trade their results for journal impact factors: results from a discrete choice experiment
-
The death and resurrection of manuscript submission systems
-
Ryan Jenkins, David Černý and Tomáš Hříbek (eds) Autonomous Vehicle Ethics: The Trolley Problem and Beyond
The Interface between Intellectual Property Rights and Competition Law and Policy: An Australian Perspective
PAPERS