Agnes Horvath has written about politics, sociology and the social functions of tricksters and other subversive forces. She appears well qualified to discuss the social function of magic, especially if, as the title of her book suggests, this function is associated with the social function of science. Magic and science are socially significant in pursuit of advantage through arcane knowledge and, usually, forces unperceived by the laity. The only problem with the title is that magic is a thing, while the ‘will to science’ is presumably a human psychological state. Is Horvath comparing apples with a lust for oranges? Surely in the course of this book, all will be made clear. Unfortunately, all is not made clear.

PAGES
117 – 118
DOI
All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Issues
Also in this issue:
-
Automated plagiarism
-
Generative artificial intelligence in qualitative analysis: a critical examination of tools, trust and rigor
-
‘Foreignize yourself’. What has translation to do with innovation? A translation studies approach to hybrid innovation
-
From tools to symbols: exploring the complex nexus of smartphones in Bangladesh
-
Impoverishing peer review
Agnes Horvath, Magic and the Will to Science: A Political Anthropology of Liminal Technicality
Book Review