Prometheus

Critical Studies In Innovation

PAGES

12 – 25

DOI

123456987
©
Han Solo.

Contact The Author


All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Issues

Also in this issue:

Waney Squier and shaken baby syndrome: implications for medicine and the medical expert witness

Han Solo.

Paper|Response

By Toni C. Saad

By recounting her involvement in the controversy around Shaken Baby Syndrome and making an evidence-based case against the validity of this diagnosis, Waney Squier has given the medical profession an opportunity for uncomfortable reflection. In this short response, I draw out some of this case’s implications forthe medical profession in relation to the scientific process and its involvement in the legal process. I argue that the case Waney Squier brings against Shaken Baby Syndrome is naturalto the iterative process of scientific investigation, and that its implications demand the attention and action of the medical profession.

page: 159 – 165
Prometheus: Critical Studies in Innovation Volume 35, Issue 5
SKU: 350508

No PDF file available for display.