Technological sovereignty is the capability and the freedom to select, to generate or acquire and to apply, build upon and exploit commercially technology needed for industrial innovation. It is to be distinguished from technological self-sufficiency, which is the possession of, or the ability to generate readily, all technology required. Australia’s past failure to take the sovereignty factor into account has far-reaching implications for future industry/technology strategy.

PAGES
239 – 270
DOI
All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Issues
Also in this issue:
-
Do AIs have politics? Thinking about ChatGPT through the work of Langdon Winner
-
Creating value through service innovation: an effectual design thinking framework
-
Health and medical researchers are willing to trade their results for journal impact factors: results from a discrete choice experiment
-
The death and resurrection of manuscript submission systems
-
Ryan Jenkins, David Černý and Tomáš Hříbek (eds) Autonomous Vehicle Ethics: The Trolley Problem and Beyond
TECHNOLOGICAL SOVEREIGNTY: FORGOTTEN FACTOR IN THE ‘HI-TECH’ RAZZAMATAZZ
Original Articles