This article considers the relevant framework for evaluating a major process innovation in mental health services, viz. community‐based service provision. Such services involve multiple inputs from various channels (or departments) in government and ‘the community’. Conventional economic theory of production is extended here to incorporate the notion that economic transactions are embedded in social relations, i.e. social capital is relevant to community‐based service provision. Another fertile concept is that of ‘co‐production’, due to Elinor Ostrom, a political scientist. Ostrom’s conception of co‐production between government and community inputs is outlined in the context of mental health services. A relevant question for evaluating this process innovation emerges from the co‐production framework: is social capital from government a substitute for, or complementary to, social capital from community sources?

PAGES
393 – 414
DOI
All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Issues
Also in this issue:
-
Ryan Jenkins, David Černý and Tomáš Hříbek (eds) Autonomous Vehicle Ethics: The Trolley Problem and Beyond
-
As open as possible, but as closed as necessary: openness in innovation policy
-
Turning sportswashing against sportswashers: an unconventional perspective
-
State secrets and compromises with capitalism: Lev Theremin and regimes of intellectual property
-
In search of an author
Community Mental Health Services as a Process Innovation: Appropriate Economic Evaluation
Original Articles